18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
14
18
10
21
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
6.0
11.9
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2024
Available sizes
153
47
104
164

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison