18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
14
18
11
15
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
11.6
9.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
47
121
225

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison