18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
14
18
11
10
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
11.6
6.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2026
Available sizes
153
47
121
104

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
88%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison