18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
18
21
13
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
11.9
4.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
47
164
123
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison