18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
14
18
3
3
14
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
3.7
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
47
34
60
706

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison