18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

The following comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 aims to shed light on the potential strengths and weaknesses of these two summer tyre models, based on various tests collected from different sources. Both tyres are renowned products by their manufacturers – BFGoodrich and Goodyear, respectively.


Starting off with BFGoodrich Advantage, the tyre model achieved our rating of 76%. Standing out in terms of comfort and dry handling, it consistently placed as a middle-or upper-middle finisher across the tests, such as 18th out of 53 in Autobild and 9th out of 15 in ADAC. Apart from its dynamic dry handling and noticeable silence whilst rolling, a low rolling resistance and affordable price constitute its main strengths. However, the tyre's tendency to understeer during wet conditions is flagged as a slight disadvantage.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored a higher rating at 87% from us. This model replaces its previous version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, showcasing enhanced attributes. It proved to be a strong performer in the majority of the tests, landing usually within the top 5, e.g. 4th out of 15 in ADAC, and 13th out of 53 in Autobild. The tyre's valuable features include superior mileage, a good price-value ratio, and high comfortability, with additional praise given to its dry handling and wet cornering capabilities. Take note, however, of its premium price level, which is the primary downside according to the Autobild 2022 report.


Comparing the two tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to hold a slight edge over the BFGoodrich Advantage – both in mutual test positions and overall performance. Its impressive mileage and value make it a worthwhile investment despite its high price point. Meanwhile, the BFGoodrich Advantage's strengths lie in its exceptional handling on dry roads and higher level of comfort, given that it is considerably more affordable.


Overall, the Goodyear tyre impresses with its all-round capabilities, while the BFGoodrich tyre offers strong performance at a lower price, particularly for drivers prioritizing dry road conditions and comfort.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
18
3
5
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
6.1
3.7
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
47
34
63
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison