18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
1
3
5
Best position
#13
#7
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
7.0
3.7
4.8
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
2
36
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Dry
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Comfort
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Costs
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store