18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
3
4
14
3
Best position
#13
#6
#3
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
9.0
12.0
5.5
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
91
111
700
36

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison