18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
1
4
5
3
14
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
2.2
3.7
5.5
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
63
36
700

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison