18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
10
4
5
Best position
#13
#1
#3
#1
Average position
13.0
10.4
12.0
2.8
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
151
111
139

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
48%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison