18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
10
4
3
1
Best position
#13
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
10.4
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
151
111
36
66

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
48%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison