18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
10
23
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
10.4
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
151
192

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Dry
Confidence
Linglong Sport Master
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Comfort
Confidence
Linglong Sport Master
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Costs
Confidence
Linglong Sport Master
56%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
48%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store