18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Grip Master 4S
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
5
1
Best position
#13
#4
#1
Average position
13.0
12.6
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
85
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Linglong Grip Master 4S
60%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
49%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dry
Linglong Grip Master 4S
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Snow
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Comfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Costs
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Grip Master 4S
75%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store