18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Number of tests
1
10
17
Best position
#13
#2
#5
Average position
13.0
6.0
9.5
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
109
126

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
69%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store