18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
5
4
4
Best position
#13
#1
#3
#2
Average position
13.0
2.8
12.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
139
111
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison