18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
5
10
4
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
2.8
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
139
109
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison