18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
5
1
6
Best position
#13
#1
#1
#3
Average position
13.0
2.8
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
139
27
146

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison