18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
5
18
15
Best position
#13
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
2.8
6.1
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
15
139
47
226

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison