Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ventus Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

5

18

1

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

2.8

6.1

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

15

139

47

66

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Continental VanContact Winter

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ventus Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison