18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
5
18
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
2.8
6.1
Latest test
2019
2026
2024
Available sizes
15
139
47

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison