18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
1
5
15
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
2.8
6.1
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
139
229

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison