18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Kleber
Dynaxer HP5
Number of tests
1
1
3
Best position
#13
#1
#7
Average position
13.0
1.0
15.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
66
356

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
72%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
70%
Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
62%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
88%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
90%
Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store