18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
1
26
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
64
66

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison