18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
5
10
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
2.2
6.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
63
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store