18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodride
Solmax 1
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
1
2
3
14
Best position
#13
#8
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
9.5
3.7
5.5
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
46
36
700

Wet

Wet
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodride Solmax 1
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodride Solmax 1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%

Dry

Dry
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodride Solmax 1
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodride Solmax 1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodride Solmax 1
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Costs

Costs
Goodride Solmax 1
57%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison