18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
8
5
Best position
#13
#4
#1
Average position
13.0
12.8
2.8
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
Available sizes
15
30
139

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison