Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

21

5

3

Best position

#13

#2

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

11.9

2.8

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2019

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

165

139

63

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Continental VanContact Winter

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison