Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

1

6

4

3

5

Best position

#13

#3

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

4.7

3.3

3.7

2.8

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

15

146

40

36

139

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Tyres for EV cars Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Kumho PorTran CW51

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison