18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
2
14
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
5.5
3.7
Latest test
2019
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
47
700
36

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
75%

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison