18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
SportContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
16
10
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.2
6.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
124
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Comfort
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Costs
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store