18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2026 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Number of tests
1
4
Best position
#13
#2
Average position
13.0
6.8
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
92

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
82%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
71%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
55%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison