18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When comparing two popular models from leading tyre manufacturers, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and the Firestone Roadhawk, several differences and unique qualities arise that should be considered before purchase. Both are summer tyres, designed for optimal performance in dry and warm conditions.


The Barum Bravuris 5 HM by Barum ranks at 39% in our rating, showcasing substantial performance qualities. In the ADAC test, it achieved 15th place out of 17 participating tyres. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it reached an impressive 42nd place out of 50. This tyre has not been replaced by a newer model yet, indicating its persisting popularity and solid performance.


Shifting to the Firestone Roadhawk by Firestone, it scores a percentage of 59% in our rating. It achieved 17th place out of 17 in the ADAC test and an impressive 11th position out of 50 in the Autobild test. Remarkably, its best features in the Autobild test were ‘Dry Handling’, ‘Wet Handling’, and ‘Wet side guide’. This tyre also has not been replaced by a newer model, solidifying its status as a reliable choice.


In a detailed review by Autozeitung 2023, the Roadhawk received praise for its efficiency and lightness, with excellent performance on dry roads and minimal wear. However, it also showed weaknesses including less balanced performance and difficulties in wet conditions.


On the other hand, the Autobild 2021 review highlighted Firestone Roadhawk's low fuel consumption as a major plus. But, it also pointed to weaknesses on dry roads, increased wear, and poor performance in wet conditions.


In conclusion, both the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and the Firestone Roadhawk are competitive summer tyre options with unique strengths and areas for improvement. The Barum Bravuris 5 HM stands out for consistent medium-level performance across a variety of tests, whereas the Firestone Roadhawk provides strong handling in both dry and wet conditions, albeit with some deficits on wear and balance. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends greatly on the specific driving conditions and priorities of the user.

Test Profile

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
8
21
15
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
26.4
11.9
9.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
Available sizes
161
164
225

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
18%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Dry Performance
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Comfort & Noise
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Noise Interior
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Economy
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Fuel Efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison