Comparison: Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

When comparing two popular models from leading tyre manufacturers, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and the Firestone Roadhawk, several differences and unique qualities arise that should be considered before purchase. Both are summer tyres, designed for optimal performance in dry and warm conditions.

The Barum Bravuris 5 HM by Barum ranks at 39% in our rating, showcasing substantial performance qualities. In the ADAC test, it achieved 15th place out of 17 participating tyres. Furthermore, in the Autobild test, it reached an impressive 42nd place out of 50. This tyre has not been replaced by a newer model yet, indicating its persisting popularity and solid performance.

Shifting to the Firestone Roadhawk by Firestone, it scores a percentage of 59% in our rating. It achieved 17th place out of 17 in the ADAC test and an impressive 11th position out of 50 in the Autobild test. Remarkably, its best features in the Autobild test were ‘Dry Handling’, ‘Wet Handling’, and ‘Wet side guide’. This tyre also has not been replaced by a newer model, solidifying its status as a reliable choice.

In a detailed review by Autozeitung 2023, the Roadhawk received praise for its efficiency and lightness, with excellent performance on dry roads and minimal wear. However, it also showed weaknesses including less balanced performance and difficulties in wet conditions.

On the other hand, the Autobild 2021 review highlighted Firestone Roadhawk's low fuel consumption as a major plus. But, it also pointed to weaknesses on dry roads, increased wear, and poor performance in wet conditions.

In conclusion, both the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and the Firestone Roadhawk are competitive summer tyre options with unique strengths and areas for improvement. The Barum Bravuris 5 HM stands out for consistent medium-level performance across a variety of tests, whereas the Firestone Roadhawk provides strong handling in both dry and wet conditions, albeit with some deficits on wear and balance. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends greatly on the specific driving conditions and priorities of the user.