Segment
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Lowcost2. Pneumant Summer ST2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Pneumant Summer ST2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Pneumant). Generally, Apollo summer tyres are slightly better rated (29%) than Pneumant (0%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Amazer 4G ECO and Pneumant Summer ST2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Amazer 4G ECO and the Summer ST2 were tested.
| # | Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
| Pneumant Summer ST2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Pneumant Summer ST2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Pneumant Summer ST2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 1,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Pneumant Summer ST2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,0 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
