Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3
Table of contents:
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Semperit Speed-Life 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing two summer tyres, the Apollo Alnac 4G and the Semperit Speed-life 3, it’s clear how each model defines its position in various tests and the potential benefits they offer to drivers.
Starting with the Apollo Alnac 4G, it scored a 46% rating on our site. However, according to test results from Autoklub ČR, it came 14th out of 19 tyres, while in the ADAC test it took the 6th spot out of 15. Its strengths lie in efficiency, but tests highlight considerable weaknesses in its lack of balance and poorer performance on both dry and wet surfaces. Additional downsides included environmental impact, reduced mileage, and a notable wear rate.
On the other hand, the Semperit Speed-life 3, manufactured by Semperit, secured a more favorable 59% rating on our site. It outranks the Apollo significantly in the Autoklub ČR test, coming 10th out of 19. In the ADAC test, it even clinched the 2nd place demonstrating its superiority in areas like exterior noise and wet braking. According to Autobild, it also ranked 12th out of 53 tyres excelling again in the wet braking category. However, it also showed some balancing issues and weaknesses on dry surfaces.
Both the Alnac 4G and the Speed-life 3 face concerns regarding their environmental impact. The Apollo Alnac 4G struggles with a lower life span and higher wear rate compared to other tyres. In contrast, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 pulls ahead with better efficiency and a good mileage lifespan.
Considering the overall performance, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 edges the Apollo Alnac 4G, excelling in wet conditions, noise reduction, and having a better lifespan. However, both tyres could improve in the areas of dry surface performance and environmental impact.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 18.072. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 96,7 | 97,3 | 96,1 | ||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 | 100,6 | 102,5 | 98,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 | 37,7 | 30,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
