18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

The Apollo Alnac 4G and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 are two tyres that have been tested across various parameters and conditions. Despite both being summer tyres, the performance and rating detail considerable differences.


Talking about the Apollo Alnac 4G, according to our testing, it scores an average rating of 46%. It exhibited efficiency as a plus point in the 'Autobild 2020' test. However, the tyre showed various flaws such as being unbalanced, with weaknesses on dry and wet pavement. It also had a comparatively low environmental balance and sustainability rate and a relatively low mileage, resulting in high wear and tear. According to the 'ADAC' and 'Autobild' comparison tests, it scored the 6th and 21st position out of 15 and 53 tyres, respectively.


On the other hand, the successor to the previously successful Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, stands out as a better performer. Our testing gave it a remarkably high rating of 84%. The 'ADAC' and 'Autobuild' tests marked it at the 4th and 13th positions out of 15 and 53 tyres, respectively. Its strengths included commendable mileage, excellent price/value ratio, and a comfortable driving experience, as appreciated in the 'Autobild' test. Currently, there's no newer model available that replaces this tyre.


To sum it up, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 outperforms the Apollo Alnac 4G in all aspects. With superior test ratings and features, it proves to be a dependable choice. However, it's always advisable to consider personal preferences and requirements when choosing tyres.


For more tire comparisons and reviews, visit our Goodyear and Apollo manufacturer pages.

Test Profile

Apollo
Alnac 4G
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
8
18
17
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
18.9
6.1
1.7
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
Available sizes
77
47
80

Wet

Wet
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet braking
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Alnac 4G
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Apollo Alnac 4G
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Apollo Alnac 4G
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Apollo Alnac 4G
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Apollo Alnac 4G
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Interior noise
Apollo Alnac 4G
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Rolling resistance
Apollo Alnac 4G
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison