Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium
Comparison: Aplus A919 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Aplus) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Aplus (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/65 R17 test, where both the A919 and the Turanza 6 were tested.
| # | Aplus A919
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Aplus A919 12.
Worst position in test
1. Aplus A919 12.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Offroad
(Overall rating)Sand traction
1. Aplus A919 73%
Handling on gravel
1. Aplus A919 73%
Grass traction
1. Aplus A919 100%
Gravel traction
1. Aplus A919 87%
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Aplus A919 46%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Aplus A919 46%
Wet braking
2. Aplus A919 24%
Wet circle cornering
2. Aplus A919 42%
Wet handling
2. Aplus A919 35%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Aplus A919 60%
Comfort
2. Aplus A919 60%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Aplus A919 45%
Dry handling
2. Aplus A919 46%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Aplus A919 46%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aplus A919 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
