Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (34%) than Zeetex (0%). But when it comes to comparing Zeetex HP2000 VFM and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Zeetex HP2000 VFM was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the HP2000 VFM and the Ultrac Vorti were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Zeetex HP2000 VFM
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
