Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Upper-middle

Yokohama

W.drive V905

R16 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

W.drive V905

MS plus 77

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

10

19

23

49

Best position

#7

#3

#1

Average position

14.0

11.2

6.7

3.2

Latest test

2019

2021

2025

2024

Available sizes

8

76

107

213

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

73%

Yokohama

W.drive V905

82%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

87%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Wet Braking

Yokohama W.drive V905

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

Wet Handling

Yokohama W.drive V905

73%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Wet Circle Cornering

Yokohama W.drive V905

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Yokohama W.drive V905

63%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Aquaplaning Cross

Yokohama W.drive V905

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry Performance

83%

Yokohama

W.drive V905

83%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

77%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Dry Braking

Yokohama W.drive V905

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Dry Handling

Yokohama W.drive V905

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Snow Performance

78%

Yokohama

W.drive V905

84%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

92%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Snow Braking

Yokohama W.drive V905

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

92%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Snow Traction

Yokohama W.drive V905

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Snow Handling

Yokohama W.drive V905

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Snow Circle Cornering

Yokohama W.drive V905

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

Comfort & Noise

79%

Yokohama

W.drive V905

82%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

90%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Noise Exterior

Yokohama W.drive V905

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Ride Comfort

Yokohama W.drive V905

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Economy

80%

Yokohama

W.drive V905

78%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

80%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Rolling Resistance

Yokohama W.drive V905

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Mileage

Yokohama W.drive V905

73%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

W.drive V905

MS plus 77

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison