18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test Profile

Yokohama
W.drive V905
Barum
Polaris 3
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Number of tests
10
10
8
23
23
Best position
#7
#3
#12
#1
#1
Average position
14.0
10.6
22.3
6.7
2.3
Latest test
2019
2018
2021
2025
2021
Available sizes
8
67
43
107
76

Wet

Wet
Yokohama W.drive V905
69%
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Wet handling
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Wet braking
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Wet performance
Yokohama W.drive V905
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Snow

Snow
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Snow traction
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Snow handling
Yokohama W.drive V905
76%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Snow braking
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Snow performance
Yokohama W.drive V905
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Snow cornering
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama W.drive V905
91%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Dry braking
Yokohama W.drive V905
88%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Dry performance
Yokohama W.drive V905
86%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Dry driving behavior
Yokohama W.drive V905
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Dry handling
Yokohama W.drive V905
92%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama W.drive V905
72%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Mileage
Yokohama W.drive V905
62%
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Fuel efficiency
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Price/value
Yokohama W.drive V905
79%
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama W.drive V905
59%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Exterior noise
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Comfort
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Interior noise
Yokohama W.drive V905
53%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Ice

Ice
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Ice lateral guidance
Yokohama W.drive V905
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Ice braking
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison