18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
34

Wet

Wet
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison