18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Yokohama (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 74% compared to 55% of the Yokohama BluEarth-XT. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-XT was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. We also know where BluEarth-XT is made - Japan.

Test Profile

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
10
Best position
#7
#2
Average position
7.0
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
104

Wet

Wet
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Comfort
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Exterior noise
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison