Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodride Solmax 1

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth-XT

VS

ION Evo

Solmax 1

3.9

R17 – R22

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

BluEarth-XT

ION Evo

Solmax 1

Number of tests

1

Best position

#7

#1

#8

Average position

7.0

1.0

8.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

—

64

46

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

89%

Hankook

ION Evo

Wet Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Wet Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Wet Circle Cornering

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Aquaplaning Cross

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Dry Performance

92%

Hankook

ION Evo

Dry Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Dry Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Comfort & Noise

66%

Hankook

ION Evo

Noise Exterior

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Economy

76%

Hankook

ION Evo

Rolling Resistance

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Mileage

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2025	215/55 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodride Solmax 1

BluEarth-XT

ION Evo

Solmax 1

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison