Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth-XT

VS

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BluEarth-XT

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

3

Best position

#7

#1

#2

Average position

7.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

—

64

34

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

89%

Hankook

ION Evo

69%

Falken

e.Ziex

Wet Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

62%

Wet Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

59%

Wet Circle Cornering

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning Cross

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry Performance

92%

Hankook

ION Evo

70%

Falken

e.Ziex

Dry Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

67%

Comfort & Noise

66%

Hankook

ION Evo

66%

Falken

e.Ziex

Noise Exterior

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

66%

Economy

76%

Hankook

ION Evo

78%

Falken

e.Ziex

Rolling Resistance

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

96%

Mileage

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2025	215/55 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison