Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth-XT

VS

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

1

3

4

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

7.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

34

—

Wet

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Wet braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Costs

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Dry

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Comfort

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Comfort

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

81%

Exterior noise

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison