Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth-XT

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

3

1

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

7.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

—

34

64

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

69%

Falken

e.Ziex

89%

Hankook

ION Evo

Wet Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Falken e.Ziex

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

59%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet Circle Cornering

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Aquaplaning Cross

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dry Performance

70%

Falken

e.Ziex

92%

Hankook

ION Evo

Dry Braking

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry Handling

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Falken e.Ziex

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort & Noise

66%

Falken

e.Ziex

66%

Hankook

ION Evo

Noise Exterior

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Falken e.Ziex

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Economy

78%

Falken

e.Ziex

76%

Hankook

ION Evo

Rolling Resistance

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

96%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2025	215/55 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison