18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
28
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
2.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
66
34

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Wet Braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Wet Handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Wet Circle Cornering
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning Cross
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Dry Braking
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry Handling
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Noise Exterior
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Rolling Resistance
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
51%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Mileage
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025215/55 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison