Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Upper-middle

Yokohama

BluEarth winter WY01

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

BluEarth winter WY01

PorTran CW51

Blizzak W810

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Number of tests

1

Best position

#11

#8

#7

#9

Average position

11.0

8.0

7.0

9.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

19

21

56

18

Wet

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

47%

Kumho PorTran CW51

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Dry

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

77%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

63%

Snow

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

69%

Kumho PorTran CW51

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Comfort

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

82%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

56%

Ice

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

74%

Costs

Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

80%

Kumho PorTran CW51

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

BluEarth winter WY01

PorTran CW51

Blizzak W810

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Ice

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison