Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Pirelli Cinturato P7 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the Cinturato P7 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 has A wet grip rating, whereas 78% of Pirelli Cinturato P7 has B rating.
# | Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Pirelli Cinturato P7
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: - | 3.7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Good - | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 1,7 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,3 | ||
Show test details |