18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Toyo Proxes Comfort first tested.

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Number of tests
6
16
Best position
#6
#5
Average position
11.8
9.7
Latest test
2020
2025
Available sizes
12
116

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
63%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
65%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
78%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
74%
Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
83%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison